2005 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1959 Seat 600
To start off, 2005 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2005 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 824 more horse power than 1959 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1959 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lotec C 1000 weights approximately 505 kg more than 1959 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 950 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lotec C 1000 | 1959 Seat 600 | |
Make | Lotec | Seat |
Model | C 1000 | 600 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 843 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1360 mm |