2005 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1989 TVR 400
To start off, 2005 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 TVR 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 TVR 400 would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 568 more horse power than 1989 TVR 400. (275 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1989 TVR 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 TVR 400 weights approximately 70 kg more than 2005 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 624 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 TVR 400. (366 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 TVR 400.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lotec C 1000 | 1989 TVR 400 | |
Make | Lotec | TVR |
Model | C 1000 | 400 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5500 cc | 3996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 843 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1230 mm |