2005 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2003 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2005 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru Outback. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru Outback would be higher. At 5,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 681 more horse power than 2003 Subaru Outback. (162 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru Outback. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Subaru Outback weights approximately 355 kg more than 2005 Lotec C 1000.
Because 2003 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Lotec C 1000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 765 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru Outback. (225 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2005 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lotec C 1000 | 2003 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Lotec | Subaru |
Model | C 1000 | Outback |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5500 cc | 2457 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 843 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1550 mm |