2005 Lotus Elise vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 2005 Lotus Elise is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 5,341 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (212 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 2005 Lotus Elise. (120 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 2005 Lotus Elise. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 565 kg more than 2005 Lotus Elise. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Lotus Elise | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
| Make | Lotus | Pontiac |
| Model | Elise | Tempest |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 5341 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 212 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 785 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2930 mm |
