2005 Mahindra Armada vs. 1963 Opel Kadett
To start off, 2005 Mahindra Armada is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Opel Kadett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Opel Kadett would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1963 Opel Kadett. (47 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1963 Opel Kadett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1298 kg more than 1963 Opel Kadett. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Opel Kadett. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mahindra Armada | 1963 Opel Kadett | |
Make | Mahindra | Opel |
Model | Armada | Kadett |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 702 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3930 mm |