2005 Mahindra Armada vs. 1967 Mercury Comet
To start off, 2005 Mahindra Armada is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 3,279 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Comet (119 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2005 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 2005 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 600 kg more than 1967 Mercury Comet.
Because 2005 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Mercury Comet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mahindra Armada | 1967 Mercury Comet | |
Make | Mahindra | Mercury |
Model | Armada | Comet |
Year Released | 2005 | 1967 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3279 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 5000 mm |