2005 Mahindra Armada vs. 1995 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Mahindra Armada is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1995 Renault Clio. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1995 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1145 kg more than 1995 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mahindra Armada | 1995 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mahindra | Renault |
Model | Armada | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 1995 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2000 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3710 mm |