2005 Mahindra CL vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 Mahindra CL is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2005 Mahindra CL. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 2005 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mahindra CL weights approximately 560 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2005 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mahindra CL (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2005 Mahindra CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mahindra CL | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Mahindra | MCC |
| Model | CL | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 2523 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
