2005 Marcos TSO vs. 1962 Seat 600
To start off, 2005 Marcos TSO is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Seat 600 would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Marcos TSO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Marcos TSO (475 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 456 more horse power than 1962 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Marcos TSO should accelerate faster than 1962 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Marcos TSO weights approximately 595 kg more than 1962 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Marcos TSO (535 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 495 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Marcos TSO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Marcos TSO | 1962 Seat 600 | |
Make | Marcos | Seat |
Model | TSO | 600 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5666 cc | 597 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 475 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 535 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2010 mm |