2005 Marcos TSO vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Marcos TSO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Marcos TSO would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Marcos TSO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Marcos TSO (400 HP) has 277 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (123 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Marcos TSO should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 80 kg more than 2005 Marcos TSO.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Marcos TSO (534 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (294 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Marcos TSO will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Marcos TSO | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Marcos | Mitsubishi |
Model | TSO | Colt |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5666 cc | 2834 cc |
Horse Power | 400 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 534 Nm | 294 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 100 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1160 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2970 mm |