2005 Mazda 2 vs. 1969 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 2005 Mazda 2 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Pontiac Firebird weights approximately 630 kg more than 2005 Mazda 2.
Because 1969 Pontiac Firebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Pontiac Firebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 2 | 1969 Pontiac Firebird | |
Make | Mazda | Pontiac |
Model | 2 | Firebird |
Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2750 mm |