2005 Mazda 2 vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2005 Mazda 2 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,398 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 2 (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 2 weights approximately 390 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 2 (160 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 2 | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Mazda | Zastava |
Model | 2 | 102 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2160 mm |