2005 Mazda 2 vs. 1992 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 2005 Mazda 2 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,466 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Plymouth Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Plymouth Colt (91 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 2. (79 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Plymouth Colt should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 2 weights approximately 125 kg more than 1992 Plymouth Colt.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 2 (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda 2 | 1992 Plymouth Colt | |
| Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
| Model | 2 | Colt |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1388 cc | 1466 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 79 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 124 Nm | 123 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2400 mm |
