2005 Mazda 2 vs. 1995 Rover 214
To start off, 2005 Mazda 2 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 214. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 214 would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 214 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 214 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 2. (74 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 214 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 2 weights approximately 93 kg more than 1995 Rover 214.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Rover 214 (128 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda 2. (107 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 Rover 214 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 2 | 1995 Rover 214 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | 2 | 214 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 107 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Top Speed | 163 km/hour | 169 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |