2005 Mazda 2 vs. 2010 Pontiac G3
To start off, 2010 Pontiac G3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Pontiac G3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Pontiac G3 (105 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 2. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Pontiac G3 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 2 (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Pontiac G3. (142 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Pontiac G3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 2 | 2010 Pontiac G3 | |
Make | Mazda | Pontiac |
Model | 2 | G3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1594 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 105 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 45 L |