2005 Mazda 3 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2005 Mazda 3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 3 (148 HP) has 108 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 3 weights approximately 13 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda 3 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | 3 | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 40 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1223 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 75 L |
