2005 Mazda 3 vs. 1970 NSU 1200
To start off, 2005 Mazda 3 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 NSU 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 NSU 1200 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 3 (160 HP) has 75 more horse power than 1970 NSU 1200. (85 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1970 NSU 1200.
Because 1970 NSU 1200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 NSU 1200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 3 (203 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 NSU 1200. (81 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 NSU 1200.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda 3 | 1970 NSU 1200 | |
| Make | Mazda | NSU |
| Model | 3 | 1200 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 85 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 69.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 66.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2240 mm |
