2005 Mazda 3 vs. 1984 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2005 Mazda 3 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,306 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 3 (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1984 Ford Tempo. (89 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 3 weights approximately 148 kg more than 1984 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 3 (203 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 3 | 1984 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | 3 | Tempo |
Year Released | 2005 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2306 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 170 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 79.5 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1253 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2540 mm |