2005 Mazda 3 vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Mazda 3 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1991 Renault Clio. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1991 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 3 weights approximately 330 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Renault Clio (182 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda 3. (148 Nm). This means 1991 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 3 | 1991 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 3 | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 48 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 148 Nm | 182 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2470 mm |