2005 Mazda 3 vs. 1999 Saturn SL
To start off, 2005 Mazda 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Saturn SL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Saturn SL would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Saturn SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 3 (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 1999 Saturn SL. (100 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1999 Saturn SL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 3 weights approximately 185 kg more than 1999 Saturn SL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 3 (225 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Saturn SL. (158 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Saturn SL.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 3 | 1999 Saturn SL | |
Make | Mazda | Saturn |
Model | 3 | SL |
Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 225 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 1055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |