2005 Mazda 3 vs. 2004 Opel Tigra
To start off, 2005 Mazda 3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Opel Tigra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Opel Tigra would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2004 Opel Tigra. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Opel Tigra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Opel Tigra weights approximately 42 kg more than 2005 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 3 (183 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Opel Tigra. (171 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Opel Tigra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda 3 | 2004 Opel Tigra | |
| Make | Mazda | Opel |
| Model | 3 | Tigra |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 171 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 80.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 88.2 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1223 kg | 1265 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 6.7 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 8.4 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 45 L |
