2005 Mazda 3 vs. 2009 Nissan Qashqai

To start off, 2009 Nissan Qashqai is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 3 (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Qashqai. (113 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Qashqai. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Qashqai weights approximately 189 kg more than 2005 Mazda 3.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 3 (203 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Nissan Qashqai. (160 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Nissan Qashqai.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Mazda 3 2009 Nissan Qashqai
Make Mazda Nissan
Model 3 Qashqai
Year Released 2005 2009
Body Type Sedan Crossover
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2260 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 160 HP 113 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 203 Nm 160 Nm
Engine Bore Size 87 mm 78 mm
Engine Stroke Size 94 mm 83.6 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.7:1 9.8:1
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1253 kg 1442 kg
Vehicle Length 4490 mm 4320 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1620 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2640 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 8.4 L/100km 6.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 55 L 65 L