2005 Mazda 3 vs. 2010 Audi A6
To start off, 2010 Audi A6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A6 (230 HP) has 122 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 3. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 3.
Because 2010 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Audi A6 has automatic transmission and 2005 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2005 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Audi A6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 3 | 2010 Audi A6 | |
Make | Mazda | Audi |
Model | 3 | A6 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1560 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 230 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4934 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1519 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2833 mm |