2005 Mazda 3 vs. 2010 GMC Terrain
To start off, 2010 GMC Terrain is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 GMC Terrain is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 GMC Terrain (182 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 3. (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 GMC Terrain should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 GMC Terrain weights approximately 492 kg more than 2005 Mazda 3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 GMC Terrain (233 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda 3. (203 Nm). This means 2010 GMC Terrain will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 3 | 2010 GMC Terrain | |
Make | Mazda | GMC |
Model | 3 | Terrain |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 233 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1253 kg | 1745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4707 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1849 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2858 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.4 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.4 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 68 L |