2005 Mazda 6 vs. 1960 Seat 600

To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1960 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1960 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 770 kg more than 1960 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (244 Nm) has 204 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Seat 600. (40 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Seat 600.

Compare all specifications: