2005 Mazda 6 vs. 1960 Simca Vedette
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Simca Vedette. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Simca Vedette would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 307 kg more than 1960 Simca Vedette.
Because 1960 Simca Vedette is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Simca Vedette. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda 6 | 1960 Simca Vedette | |
| Make | Mazda | Simca |
| Model | 6 | Vedette |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1290 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 160 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1407 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 42 L |
