2005 Mazda 6 vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66.
Because 1976 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (260 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 6 | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 6 | 66 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1550 mm |