2005 Mazda 6 vs. 1982 Lancia Gamma
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lancia Gamma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lancia Gamma would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1982 Lancia Gamma. (116 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Lancia Gamma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 119 kg more than 1982 Lancia Gamma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (210 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lancia Gamma. (175 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lancia Gamma.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 6 | 1982 Lancia Gamma | |
Make | Mazda | Lancia |
Model | 6 | Gamma |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 175 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.9:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1439 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 59 L |