2005 Mazda 6 vs. 1982 Plymouth Caravelle
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Plymouth Caravelle would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 242 kg more than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (210 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle. (159 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Plymouth Caravelle.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 6 | 1982 Plymouth Caravelle | |
Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
Model | 6 | Caravelle |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 159 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1407 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2630 mm |