2005 Mazda 6 vs. 1992 Holden Apollo
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1992 Holden Apollo. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1992 Holden Apollo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 335 kg more than 1992 Holden Apollo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (260 Nm) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Apollo. (172 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 6 | 1992 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | 6 | Apollo |
Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 172 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2610 mm |