2005 Mazda 6 vs. 1992 Plymouth Colt
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Plymouth Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Plymouth Colt would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (119 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (91 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1992 Plymouth Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 488 kg more than 1992 Plymouth Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (323 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Plymouth Colt. (123 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Plymouth Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 6 | 1992 Plymouth Colt | |
Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
Model | 6 | Colt |
Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1466 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 123 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1488 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2400 mm |