2005 Mazda 6 vs. 1992 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1992 Renault Clio. (48 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1992 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 760 kg more than 1992 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (260 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Renault Clio. (81 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 6 | 1992 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 6 | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 1992 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1107 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 48 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 81 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 80 mm | 72 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |