2005 Mazda 6 vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,292 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (164 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (138 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 440 kg more than 1993 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (214 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Renault Clio. (187 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 6 | 1993 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 6 | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 1993 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 2292 cc | 1764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 214 Nm | 187 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 83.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1415 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1400 mm |