2005 Mazda 6 vs. 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 171 kg more than 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder.
Because 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda 6 | 1998 Plymouth Pronto Spyder | |
| Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
| Model | 6 | Pronto Spyder |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1485 kg | 1314 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 46 L |
