2005 Mazda 6 vs. 2001 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,543 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mercury Cougar (196 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 6. (134 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 133 kg more than 2001 Mercury Cougar.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (310 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mercury Cougar. (228 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mercury Cougar.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Mazda 6 2001 Mercury Cougar
Make Mazda Mercury
Model 6 Cougar
Year Released 2005 2001
Body Type Station Wagon Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 2543 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 134 HP 196 HP
Engine RPM 3500 RPM 6750 RPM
Torque 310 Nm 228 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 5500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 18.0:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1540 kg 1407 kg
Vehicle Length 4690 mm 4710 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2710 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 58 L