2005 Mazda 6 vs. 2002 Suzuki Covie
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Suzuki Covie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Suzuki Covie would be higher. At 2,262 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (160 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki Covie. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 657 kg more than 2002 Suzuki Covie. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (210 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki Covie. (111 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki Covie.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 6 | 2002 Suzuki Covie | |
Make | Mazda | Suzuki |
Model | 6 | Covie |
Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 111 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1407 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 2950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 1530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 35 L |