2005 Mazda 6 vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Volvo XC90 would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo XC90 (268 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 6. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 797 kg more than 2005 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo XC90 (380 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda 6. (244 Nm). This means 2002 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda 6 | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | 6 | XC90 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2922 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 99 HP | 268 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 244 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 210 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 11 seconds | 9.3 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 2142 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.2 L/100km | 12.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 72 L |
