2005 Mazda 6 vs. 2003 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 6. (119 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 980 kg more than 2003 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2003 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 6 | 2003 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Mazda | Westfield |
Model | 6 | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2320 mm |