2005 Mazda 6 vs. 2004 Nissan Frontier
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Frontier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Frontier would be higher. At 3,278 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Frontier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Frontier (210 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 6. (119 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Frontier should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Frontier weights approximately 343 kg more than 2005 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Frontier (334 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda 6. (323 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Frontier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 6 | 2004 Nissan Frontier | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | 6 | Frontier |
Year Released | 2005 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3278 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 323 Nm | 334 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 91.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.9:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1488 kg | 1831 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 5540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.5 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 73 L |