2005 Mazda 6 vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (164 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2008 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda 6. (214 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda 6 | 2008 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | 6 | Epica |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2292 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 164 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 214 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.9 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
