2005 Mazda 6 vs. 2009 Holden Caprice

To start off, 2009 Holden Caprice is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden Caprice is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Caprice (344 HP) has 225 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 6. (119 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Caprice should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 6.

Because 2009 Holden Caprice is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden Caprice. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Caprice (530 Nm) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda 6. (323 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Caprice will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda 6. 2009 Holden Caprice has automatic transmission and 2005 Mazda 6 has manual transmission. 2005 Mazda 6 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Holden Caprice will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: