2005 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 Acura CSX
To start off, 2010 Acura CSX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2010 Acura CSX. (155 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2010 Acura CSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 87 kg more than 2010 Acura CSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (230 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Acura CSX. (188 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Acura CSX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 6 | 2010 Acura CSX | |
Make | Mazda | Acura |
Model | 6 | CSX |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 188 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1343 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.4 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.2 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |