2005 Mazda 6 vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer

To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 175 kg more than 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (260 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer. (226 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Mazda 6 2010 Mitsubishi Lancer
Make Mazda Mitsubishi
Model 6 Lancer
Year Released 2005 2010
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2966 cc 2400 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 220 HP 168 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 260 Nm 226 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1540 kg 1365 kg
Vehicle Length 4750 mm 4572 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1763 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1491 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2634 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 9.1 L/100km 8.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 12.4 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 59 L