2005 Mazda 6 vs. 2011 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2011 Jeep Compass is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda 6 would be higher. Both 2005 Mazda 6 and 2011 Jeep Compass are equipped with a 2,000 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Compass (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 6. (134 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (311 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Jeep Compass. (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Jeep Compass.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 6 | 2011 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Mazda | Jeep |
Model | 6 | Compass |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1656 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2634 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 51 L |