2005 Mazda 6 vs. 2012 Chrysler 200
To start off, 2012 Chrysler 200 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Chrysler 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chrysler 200 (280 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 6. (220 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chrysler 200 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chrysler 200 weights approximately 270 kg more than 2005 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chrysler 200 (352 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda 6. (260 Nm). This means 2012 Chrysler 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 6 | 2012 Chrysler 200 | |
Make | Mazda | Chrysler |
Model | 6 | 200 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 280 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 260 Nm | 352 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1544 kg | 1814 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4948 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2766 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 64 L |