2005 Mazda 6 vs. 2012 Saab 03-Sep
To start off, 2012 Saab 03-Sep is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Saab 03-Sep (180 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 6. (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Saab 03-Sep should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 6.
Because 2012 Saab 03-Sep is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda 6. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Saab 03-Sep will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Saab 03-Sep (400 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda 6. (230 Nm). This means 2012 Saab 03-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 6 | 2012 Saab 03-Sep | |
Make | Mazda | Saab |
Model | 6 | 03-Sep |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2261 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 400 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 90.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 82 mm |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 58 L |