2005 Mazda 6 vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda 6 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo C30 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2005 Mazda 6. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo C30 weights approximately 112 kg more than 2005 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo C30 (320 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda 6. (244 Nm). This means 2013 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda 6 | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | 6 | C30 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 244 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 240 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11 seconds | 6.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1457 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2640 mm |