2005 Mazda B2300 vs. 1969 Opel Commodore
To start off, 2005 Mazda B2300 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Opel Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Opel Commodore would be higher. At 2,490 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Opel Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda B2300 (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1969 Opel Commodore. (115 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 1969 Opel Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 188 kg more than 1969 Opel Commodore. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Opel Commodore. (177 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Opel Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda B2300 | 1969 Opel Commodore | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | B2300 | Commodore |
Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 177 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 69.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1358 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 70 L |