2005 Mazda B2300 vs. 1972 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2005 Mazda B2300 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Datsun 240Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Datsun 240Z (151 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2005 Mazda B2300. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Datsun 240Z should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda B2300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B2300 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1972 Datsun 240Z.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Datsun 240Z. (198 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Datsun 240Z.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda B2300 | 1972 Datsun 240Z | |
Make | Mazda | Datsun |
Model | B2300 | 240Z |
Year Released | 2005 | 1972 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 209 Nm | 198 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1358 kg | 1068 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2300 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 11 L/100km |