2005 Mazda B2300 vs. 2001 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Mazda B2300 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda B2300 (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2001 Ford Ranger. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B2300 should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 362 kg more than 2005 Mazda B2300.
Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Mazda B2300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda B2300 (209 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Ford Ranger. (203 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda B2300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda B2300 | 2001 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | B2300 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2262 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 209 Nm | 203 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1358 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3010 mm |
